Maybe that blogger … Maybe that blogger who wrote mindless crap on the blogger about the supermodel would want to think twice before posting any more garbage about her. How would HE feel if someone one else were to blog to everybody else unflattering comments on the internet about him?
I’m not a blogger … I’m not a blogger making money off talkin about other people either and if I was then I would. Nice try moonshad0w25, maybe you should stick to facebook and myspace with your cute little icon pic and everything.
Anyone who sues for … Anyone who sues for millions of dollars over something petty should be put to death. The lawyers who try to leach some of those million should be subject to 50 years of the Chinese water drop. Is losing your privacy through a court order really more valuable to this country than most doctors and engineers? Cause that’s essentially what these schmucks are saying by suing for 18 million.
the whole thing is … the whole thing is crap, I love how this coward blogger is complaining about her “rights” despite all the defamatory insults she flings at the model. In my opinion nobody on the internet should be anonymous. If you don’t have the balls to say something in anyone’s face or not show your face, you don’t have the right to say it. The model should grow up and take insults but that blogger is in the wrong, not just her but all the gutless shitbags who hide behind their computers with fake courage.
Shut Up! You guys … Shut Up! You guys wish you could get the 18million. POINT PERIOD BLANK, information should be protected. I am sure she got the figures from her lawyer. DUH! The model shouldn’t have sued in the first place, if she can sue over something so medocre, so can the blogger.
yes she does and … yes she does and shes ugly stupid skank whore she failed at a career she never had nor was meant for so shes angry now, what a stupid bitch.. figures.. americans.. im american too, i know first hand.
first off google … first off google had to follow the request for legal purposes, google was told to provide the info by a written request from there lawyers, so they did it legally
i AGREE WITH HIM, … i AGREE WITH HIM, PEOPLE CALL YOU NAMES. OR TALK ABOUT YOU BEHIND YOUR BACK AND THEN WHEN YOU ASK THEM, THEY SAY, I DIDNT SAY THAT.
The legal burden of … The legal burden of proof falls on the plaintiff. Any $ award would be based on a genuine loss or a malicious tort. I really fail to see a successful suit for either party. This seems to be two angry women at odds. If the suit isn’t thrown out, a $1.00award might result, with only lawyers reaping any sizeable benefit.
No, the lady is not a ’skank!’ And Google’s hand was forced by a court order. So, just apologize to each other, keep your $, and move on with your lives.
Watch more at http://www.theyoungturks.com
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Rosemary Port is an …
Rosemary Port is an ugly promiscuous disgusting skank fuck. Now go ahead and sue me, you cunt.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Maybe that blogger …
Maybe that blogger who wrote mindless crap on the blogger about the supermodel would want to think twice before posting any more garbage about her. How would HE feel if someone one else were to blog to everybody else unflattering comments on the internet about him?
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Messyman16 yes im …
Messyman16 yes im glad someone agrees with me no one should say crap online
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
…
vvblnbbbnbnbngnggngngmgmgmg
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
i should stick to …
i should stick to myspace,umm you just called me a dork..lol.wow
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
I’m not a blogger …
I’m not a blogger making money off talkin about other people either and if I was then I would. Nice try moonshad0w25, maybe you should stick to facebook and myspace with your cute little icon pic and everything.
what a dork
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
did she win the sue …
did she win the sue? results? results?!?! results?!?!
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
I agree 100%.
I agree 100%.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Agreed.
Agreed.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Anyone who sues for …
Anyone who sues for millions of dollars over something petty should be put to death. The lawyers who try to leach some of those million should be subject to 50 years of the Chinese water drop. Is losing your privacy through a court order really more valuable to this country than most doctors and engineers? Cause that’s essentially what these schmucks are saying by suing for 18 million.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
the whole thing is …
the whole thing is crap, I love how this coward blogger is complaining about her “rights” despite all the defamatory insults she flings at the model. In my opinion nobody on the internet should be anonymous. If you don’t have the balls to say something in anyone’s face or not show your face, you don’t have the right to say it. The model should grow up and take insults but that blogger is in the wrong, not just her but all the gutless shitbags who hide behind their computers with fake courage.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
This is bullshit. …
This is bullshit. Freedom of speech and expression. I hope this woman gets $100 million.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
you know well …
you know well she just wants money.shame shame ~>~
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
ok…. you are so …
ok…. you are so smart. Maybe you should run the country. Nah, jk… you sounded pretty dumb with that comment. Keep trying though.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
woh the things …
woh the things people sue for
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
I hope she loses.
I hope she loses.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Shut Up! You guys …
Shut Up! You guys wish you could get the 18million. POINT PERIOD BLANK, information should be protected. I am sure she got the figures from her lawyer. DUH! The model shouldn’t have sued in the first place, if she can sue over something so medocre, so can the blogger.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Hope she wins
Hope she wins
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Right to privacy.
Right to privacy.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
yes she does and …
yes she does and shes ugly stupid skank whore she failed at a career she never had nor was meant for so shes angry now, what a stupid bitch.. figures.. americans.. im american too, i know first hand.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
ouch, my ears hurt!
ouch, my ears hurt!
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
first off google …
first off google had to follow the request for legal purposes, google was told to provide the info by a written request from there lawyers, so they did it legally
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
i AGREE WITH HIM, …
i AGREE WITH HIM, PEOPLE CALL YOU NAMES. OR TALK ABOUT YOU BEHIND YOUR BACK AND THEN WHEN YOU ASK THEM, THEY SAY, I DIDNT SAY THAT.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Yeah, tacos make me …
Yeah, tacos make me poop, but its worth it..thats how i roll..
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
The legal burden of …
The legal burden of proof falls on the plaintiff. Any $ award would be based on a genuine loss or a malicious tort. I really fail to see a successful suit for either party. This seems to be two angry women at odds. If the suit isn’t thrown out, a $1.00award might result, with only lawyers reaping any sizeable benefit.
No, the lady is not a ’skank!’ And Google’s hand was forced by a court order. So, just apologize to each other, keep your $, and move on with your lives.